Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 13th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Eastwood Advertiser site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Breakdown in tackling congestion



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Business leaders have expressed their dismay about the breakdown in co-operation between local authorities over how to tackle congestion in the three cities area - Derby, Nottingham and Leicester.
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire Chamber says that the muddle surrounding the different approaches, which include road charging in Derby and a workplace parking levy in Nottingham, can only be damaging to the business prospects of the area.

Chief ex
ecutive George Cowcher said: "With the 6Cs study we had a unified approach between the city councils and county councils, which made sense because the problem of congestion stretches beyond the boundaries of any one authority.

"What we have now is a sorry state of affairs – a complete mess, with disagreement between and within some authorities, and confusion within the business community."

Among the Chamber's membership, congestion charging is seen as a lesser evil than the parking levy.

The latter is being pursued in Nottingham but according to the 6Cs Congestion Management Study report it would have a relatively low direct impact on congestion and would only raise £24m between the three cities for an investment package of alternatives to car travel.

The Chamber says some companies are considering moving should a tax on workplace parking be introduced.

And it points out the report states that 'further detailed consideration' would be needed to assess the wider economic impacts of congestion charging.

Mr Cowcher said: "We are extremely disappointed with this situation, which is confusing to business and the public alike. We need clarity, and we need our politicians to work together on this.

"We would argue that there are alternative solutions such as targeted improvements for particular congestion hotspots which appear not to have been considered by some.

"While we agree that investment in our transport infrastructure is vital, there are other ways of raising this revenue that would be more accountable and less damaging to business."



The full article contains 317 words and appears in Eastwood Advertiser newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 May 2008 4:17 PM
  • Source: Eastwood Advertiser
  • Location: Eastwood
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think there is room for development in our area, or do you agree with protesters that it's being turned into a "brick jungle"?
No more development, we're losing our beautiful countryside.
The protesters are overreacting

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.