fashion: a luxury too far?

File photo dated 11/06/13 of a general view of notes and coins as parents face a growing struggle as the cost of bringing up a child has risen to �148,000, research found. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Issue date: Monday August 19, 2013. The Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) said that the cost of raising a child to the age of 18 has gone up by 4% over the last year. But the value of benefits for families and children only rose by 1%, and child benefit did not rise at all, tightening the squeeze on living standards. At the same time minimum wages rose 1.8% and average earnings by 1.5%, making it harder for parents to provide a decent standard of living for their families. See PA story SOCIAL Poverty. Photo credit should read: Rui Vieira/PA Wire
File photo dated 11/06/13 of a general view of notes and coins as parents face a growing struggle as the cost of bringing up a child has risen to �148,000, research found. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Issue date: Monday August 19, 2013. The Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) said that the cost of raising a child to the age of 18 has gone up by 4% over the last year. But the value of benefits for families and children only rose by 1%, and child benefit did not rise at all, tightening the squeeze on living standards. At the same time minimum wages rose 1.8% and average earnings by 1.5%, making it harder for parents to provide a decent standard of living for their families. See PA story SOCIAL Poverty. Photo credit should read: Rui Vieira/PA Wire

In the 1940s, high fashion belonged exclusively to the well-heeled city types. They could afford Christian Dior or Norman Hartnell. We oiks loped around in WW2 army surplus, and only saw what the toffs and debutantes were wearing on the weekly Pathé newsreels at the cinema.

However, a decade after the war, the teenager was invented. We ceased being carbon copies of our hard-up parents and developed a distinctive sense of fashion.

It began with denim. We knew jeans existed because we’d seen James Dean and Elvis wearing them, but the word ‘jeans’ didn’t exist in British shops.

The British word was ‘overalls’. If you’d mentioned the name Levi Strauss they’d have thought you were referring to a waltzing Rabbi.

So when I bought my first pair of genuine American denims in 1959 I had to go to Copenhagen to get them.

They were hefty Wranglers, still made in those days in Greenboro, Carolina, not Taiwan.

My first pair of rugged, Frisco-made Levi 501s, bought in New York in 1960, cost me a week’s wages and lasted fifteen years. Today, I can buy a pair of Levi-styled jeans at Tesco for £8.

However, if I was stupid and rich enough, I could buy a pair of Gucci jeans at £2,500 or D&G’s for about £250. Fashion today is no longer about how good it feels to wear something fairly priced, well-made and stylish. Today, it’s about the brand, and how much you’ve paid.

From the 1960s onwards, fashion began to expand across class boundaries, but one element the upper crust had always valued remained - exclusivity.

And exclusivity goes with branding, and that means big, big prices. Today, a new kind of ‘fashion insanity’ infects everything, and its catch-all word is ‘designer’.

Every item we buy, the way we use it, from our clothes to a cup of coffee, is some kind of ‘statement’. Today the most important thing is not quality, but price.

Even a simple cup of coffee is now a ‘premium product’, and you’re paying well over £2 for a cardboard cup not because it’s deliciously exquisite but because it’s Starbucks or Costa.

Like £1 plastic bottles of water (surely the most profitable con-trick of century), holding your coffee in one tattooed hand and your iPhone 6 in the other as you dash to the office all combines to make a five star fashion statement. Look at me! I’m hip, cool, and busy.

Giorgio Armani said that “The difference between style and fashion is quality.” I think he got that wrong.

I’ll take a charity shop, Primark and TK-Max over a ‘designer’ bankruptcy any time.